Take the 2-minute tour ×
German Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for speakers of German wanting to discuss the finer points of the language and translation. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Possible Duplicate:
Is it an error when I do not use ß when it is necessary?

For my computer application, I have a font which does not contain the ß character. Is it acceptable in German to replace them with double s?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Em1, Takkat Jan 10 '13 at 11:17

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1  
Here is a related question: Is it an error when I do not use ß when it is necessary? –  Baz Jan 10 '13 at 8:54
    
Your answer is in URL of this page. :) german.stackexchange.com/a/5614 –  waynn Jan 10 '13 at 8:54
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

It is acceptable, because it is also common to use "SS" for words written in up-case letters, as there is no capital "ß" in the official orthography rules, so the up-case version of "Straße" ist "STRASSE" (sometimes you see things like "STRAßE" which is just a horribly incorrect spelling).

Therefore, writing "Strasse" instead of "Straße" would be formally incorrect, but acceptable in my option.

Also see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F#Substitution_and_all_caps

share|improve this answer
    
-1, capital ß exists. –  Eugene Seidel Jan 20 '13 at 21:50
1  
@Eugene Seidel: Not in the official orthography rules, see here. It says "(...) Sie ist nicht Bestandteil der amtlich verbindlichen deutschen Rechtschreibung". (It's funny that in order to prove your claim, you reference to an answer of yourself that has been down-voted) –  zero-divisor Jan 21 '13 at 9:09
    
You wrongly claimed that there is no capital ß. Kindly accept my correction that ẞ (<-- capital ß in Arial) does exist. Read past the lead of the Wiki article to find that ẞ is solidly part of Unicode. And that the managing director of the German Orthography Council has no objections to people using ẞ, but is waiting for usage to become more widespread before the Council officially acknowledges this in their rules. ẞ also has a long (if contentious) tradition in German typography. Finally I don't care how many downvotes this answer of mine (which references the selfsame Wiki article) gets. –  Eugene Seidel Jan 21 '13 at 9:47
    
@Eugene Seidel: Ok, I kindly accepted your correction. Would you please kindly remove your down-vote as well? –  zero-divisor Jan 21 '13 at 10:10
    
Downvote retracted. I disagree about the reason you gave for why it is common to use SS instead of ẞ. The hindrances to ẞ becoming more widespread are: (1) lack of ẞ on current keyboards; (2) lack of ẞ glyph in many fonts; (3) lack of stencils in signpainting shops; (4) in-house rules; (5) inertia. The non-committal attitude of the Orthography Council is not a hindrance. However, this is a matter of opinion and does not merit my maintaining the downvote. –  Eugene Seidel Jan 21 '13 at 10:56
add comment

Yes. Replacing 'ß' with 'ss' is the correct thing to do if there's no 'ß' character available. Otherwise, use of 'ß' is orthographically mandatory in Germany, Austria and Luxemburg.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.