German Language Stack Exchange is a bilingual question and answer site for speakers of all levels who want to share and increase their knowledge of the German language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've noticed more and more that sometimes instead of using a relative clause, that writers will just turn the phrase into an adjective

Was wissen Sie über die von uns angebotenen Produkte?

instead of

Was wissen Sie über die Produkte, die wir anbieten?

or in Kafka's Das Urteil

Er hatte gerade einen Brief an einen sich im Ausland befindenden Jugendfreund beendet

instead of

Er hatte gerade einen Brief an einen Jugendfreund, der sich im Ausland befindet, beendet

When do you use each one? Are they both equally grammatically valid? And what's the point (the relative clause oftentimes seems easier)?

share|improve this question
I have written an in depth article on the grammatical form ... participle constructions… If you have a very short bit of info then a this attribute is preferable even in spoken... as for the rest I agree with the answer below: – Emanuel Nov 24 '13 at 22:52
One more thing... in the Kafka quote the participle construction actually spares some tense trouble... the present tense in the relative clause is wrong because the friend is not (necessarily) abroad at the point of narration. However, using a plain preterit (befand) would leave the reader asking "When? When was he abroad?". The context should make it clear but it doesn't "feel" clear. One should add a "zu der Zeit" to make it completely smooth. Also, the double final verb sounds clunky "... befand, beendet." – Emanuel Nov 24 '13 at 23:31
wow, I really like that article and your whole blog; thank you for the link!!! Also, that explanation of the Kafka quote makes a lot of sense. Vielen Dank! – thekeyofgb Nov 25 '13 at 3:48
up vote 5 down vote accepted

That's right.

The main difference between these equally grammatically valid constructions is style.

May be unconscious, but you do the same in English. I mean, the previous sentence could also be written as

The main difference between these constructions, which are equally grammatically valid, is style.

Somehow subordinate clauses sound not so pompous. In newspapers, literature and scientific language they are often substituted by an Attribut. I wouldn't speak using an Attribut if I'm with my friends drinking beer. But I would, if I'm giving a talk or talking seriously. Anyway in oral communication, I wouldn't create a very long chain of Attributs, since I'd become incomprehensible.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.