Sign up ×
German Language Stack Exchange is a bilingual question and answer site for speakers of all levels who want to share and increase their knowledge of the German language. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I hope you could give this question a try before closing it. It's, admittedly, not directly related to German, but if a successful answer is provided, I'm sure it will be useful – at least for German learners – in finding counterexamples. Moreover, if I pose it in other site, I'm sure it will be closed faster.

There are some answers providing search techniques that are incredibly easy and very useful:

The thing is that I've tried to search in Elexiko, say, words ending in -ung that are masculine. Surprisingly it provides nothing. In Wiktionary every word is nicely indexed and free access. Hence an analogous search should be, in principle, possible.

  • Does there exist a way to perform that "advanced search" in Wiktionary?
share|improve this question
Könnte daran liegen, dass alle Wörter mit -ung feminin sind?! – Em1 Jan 14 '14 at 19:32
@Em1 Eben habe ich die -ung Endung gewählt, um keine lange Liste zu kriegen. Etwa "Ursprung, Sprung (+abgeleitete Nomen)" und ein paar mehr. – c.p. Jan 14 '14 at 19:35
Ach, Sprung und Schwung sind Ausnahmen... Damn it, warum findet er die nicht? – Em1 Jan 14 '14 at 19:38
@Em1 Genau. Die Frage lautet dann auch "Wie findet man statistisch Ausnahmen?" – c.p. Jan 14 '14 at 19:40
Das ist denk ich ein Bug. Du findest Sprung, wenn du allgemein suchst. Wahrscheinlich fehlt da einfach in der Datenbank die Information, um was für einen Worttypen es sich handelt. – Em1 Jan 14 '14 at 19:44

1 Answer 1

In Wiktionary you can use the asterik * as a wildcard Refer to their help talk page about it.

Example looking for female plural endings *-innen and Substantiv

share|improve this answer
That seem to work for *-innen Substantiv. It's not actually using the powerful indexing of wiktionary, but it's ok. However, that technique doesn't work for every search, e.g. the proposed above, because you are actually using the content of the wikipedia-article, not the indices for the word. – c.p. Jan 16 '14 at 6:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.