meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 7 months |
| seen | 10 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 20 |
|
Oct 9 |
revised |
Is it “Justageschraube” or “Justierschraube”? mentioned that “justierschraube” is indeed way more common |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Is it “Justageschraube” or “Justierschraube”? @OliverSalzburg In such cases I intrepret it as: Google didn't try to correct your spelling, but rather suggested to look up a synonymous word with more results. |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Is it “Justageschraube” or “Justierschraube”? @Em1 Yeah, but in this case: It isn't a special name for a screw of a given type, but rather a name for a screw of a given function, viz to adjust. So, I wouldn't worry too much about it. Even if so, one could just look up any differences at a screw-specializing site -– but then it isn't a question about German anymore. All in all, this question is pretty much googleable. One particular dictionary or encyclopedia may fail, but in this case, obvious options of encyclopedias and dictionaries listed both entries, obviously meaning the same. |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Is it “Justageschraube” or “Justierschraube”? Notice how google didn't say “Did you mean: …”. |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Is it “Justageschraube” or “Justierschraube”? Having said that, I'd prefer “Justierschraube” because it sounds more natural and is easier to pronounce. |
|
Oct 9 |
revised |
Is it “Justageschraube” or “Justierschraube”? more detailed explanations |
|
Oct 9 |
revised |
Übersetzung für “Fusselst Du?” added link to wiktionary |
|
Oct 9 |
answered | Is it “Justageschraube” or “Justierschraube”? |
|
Oct 9 |
awarded | Custodian |
|
Oct 9 |
reviewed | Reviewed Übersetzung für “Fusselst Du?” |
|
Oct 9 |
suggested | suggested edit on Übersetzung für “Fusselst Du?” |
|
Oct 9 |
awarded | Custodian |
|
Oct 9 |
reviewed | Reviewed How to learn German online? |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
How to learn German online? It would be helpful for people to know which resources you found to not provide much information, so they won't be suggested to you again. Also, you could add a bit more of information on what you expect. |
|
Oct 9 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Oct 9 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Ist “schwer zu angelnder” eine zulässige Satzkonstruktion? @Em1 Ich persönlich finde ja, stackexchange hat einen gewissen wissenschaftlichen Anspruch und daher sollten User hier des Englischen mächtig sein. Auf der anderen Seite ist die Frage derart fortgeschritten, dass es nichts ausmachen sollte, sie auf Deutsch zu stellen. Aber davon abgesehen: Solange man sich darüber nicht unterhalten hat, wie sprachlich konsistent man hier bleiben soll, bleibt es ja Geschmackssache, solange der Titel klar und treffend ist, was meiner war. Also finde ich das einen unberechtigten Edit. Schlimm ist's jetzt auch nicht, aber meiner Meinung nach gehört sich das nicht. |
|
Oct 9 |
asked | “einander” vs. “sich” vs. “sich gegenseitig/wechselseitig” |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Why use Konjunktiv I in mathematics? This answer needs improvement: In mathematics, it is even more common to put the verb in the first position of the sentence, e.g. „Seien A, B Mengen.“ – now, why is this possible? I know that an imperative takes the first position in a sentence – can a subjunctive as well? |
|
Oct 9 |
comment |
Why use Konjunktiv I in mathematics? Firstly, the links are outdated. Secondly: As far as I know, if an imperative is used, syntactically the verb in imperative takes the first position in a sentence, e.g.: „Öffne er die Türe!“. Also, exclamation marks are used to indicate imperative moods, why is it that they are missing and the verb takes the second position (it can take the first, e.g. „Seien A, B Mengen.“)? Also, according to the answer by Belles Lettres, this is wrong. |
