Timeline for Why is this noun dative?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2022 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackGerman/status/1511539218690060291 | ||
| Apr 4, 2022 at 23:09 | answer | added | Tilman Schmidt | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 4, 2022 at 22:31 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Apr 4, 2022 at 15:48 | history | edited | Hubert Schölnast | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 41 characters in body
|
| Apr 4, 2022 at 15:34 | answer | added | Hubert Schölnast | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 4, 2022 at 15:30 | answer | added | tofro | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 4, 2022 at 15:06 | comment | added | Hubert Schölnast | @marquinho: Yes, this is the monument. I pass by it at least once a week. (I live in St. Pölten and when I arrive in Vienna at Wiener Westbahnhof, I pass this monument.) | |
| Apr 4, 2022 at 14:42 | comment | added | marquinho | The other possibility is to read it as an apposition to a foregoing dative, but appended to "von 10000... Kindern". That would mean that the "sogenannt[e] „Kindertransport[e]”" would be a way of referring to the children themselves. IMHO an awkward expression, but conceivable. | |
| Apr 4, 2022 at 14:42 | comment | added | user6495 | Unless this an Austrian German particularity, there is at least an "in" or "mit" missing. I can deduce what is meant but the grammar is wrong. | |
| Apr 4, 2022 at 14:40 | comment | added | marquinho | For reference: is this the monument in question? | |
| S Apr 4, 2022 at 14:21 | review | First questions | |||
| Apr 4, 2022 at 15:42 | |||||
| S Apr 4, 2022 at 14:21 | history | asked | Maurice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
