Grammarians call the imperative a mood, but I'm not sure that's really a helpful way to classify it. As mentioned in the comments, it does not have a tense. You can classify sentences according to various tense, mood, aspect, etc., and ask philosophical questions about whether certain combinations exist or not. But grammar is only a description of language, a theory of which combinations of words can to said in a given language. If grammar predicts combinations that aren't possible then it's grammar that's wrong, not the language. The imperative is something of an exceptional case because some combinations can't occur in practice. For example there is no first person singular imperative. I suppose you could invent one for people who like to talk to themselves, but languages tend not to have unnecessary and unhelpful features. Similarly, until someone invents a time machine, a past tense imperative doesn't seem too practical.