Does the presence/absence of the definite article change anything? Or is it just the matter of preference whether to use it or not?

in letzter Zeit
in der letzten Zeit

The German-English Dictionary of Idioms by Hans Schemann and Paul Knight has this entry,

in der letzten Zeit - (eher:) in letzter Zeit(2;a.1) · recently

Does it mean that that the version without an article, i.e. in letzter Zeit is used more often?

  • 1
    In my opinion, the entry of the dictionary absolutely states that both mean the same and "in letzter Zeit" is used more often ("eher").
    – Matthias
    Commented Jun 9, 2014 at 0:47
  • 1
    – user6191
    Commented Jun 9, 2014 at 3:37
  • Probably "eher" is used in the sense of "preferably/rather", not in terms of occurence. If indeed so, I agree.
    – user6191
    Commented Jun 9, 2014 at 4:20

4 Answers 4


There's only a very slight difference, if any. IMO, it's a matter of emphasis:

  • Without article, it's just a fuzzy chronological classification of the following statement - the exact chronological classification doesn't matter.

  • With article, there's a slight emphasis on the chronlogical reference - maybe to express a contrast to a previous statement:

„Früher hatte ich beim Treppensteigen keine Probleme. In der letzten Zeit aber komme ich schneller ins Schwitzen.“

Using „in letzter Zeit“ in this example would be completely ok, and with both sentences in context, everyone would understand the meaning. So, the difference is minimal.


If you use the article "der" (dativ of die), you are mentioning something specific or the first time. In the given case I would use "in der letzten Zeit".


The difference is mainly syntactic. If "Zeit" is going to be specifically quantified in the post position, then the article induces parsing of a longer noun phrase

In der letzten Zeit, seit es nicht mehr regnet, ist es immer heißer geworden.

Whereas the sentence that implicitly defines the episode will be anchored on another key noun, with the tempus expressed in adverbial postposition. [I guess that's also why it should be a sentence in this paragraph.]

Die Hitze ist in letzter Zeit rasant gestiegen

But free word order renders the distinction mostly obsolete. The semantic overlap between time and weather (cf. season, day, tide, month etc.) adds to the ambiguity, as far as the indefinite "es" is concerned, The allusion is not actually lexically motivated, it's just that time is always symbolically derived from the observation of any process.

Although I do not assume a semantic distinction counciously, like the other answers as well. In addition I'd argue that a sentence starting with a proper subject will be virtually always followed by an indefinite article. e.g. "Ich habe in ..." "... letzter Zeit". Of course a fully qualified main clause can appear inserted, "Ich habe in der letzten Zeit [, in der es nicht geregnet hat, ] viel draußen unternommen". I am not deriving this from any formal framework and I'm surely not covering all use-cases. I'm just making a theoretical observation.

This syntagma is not limited to "Zeit", cp. e.g. "nächstes Mal" ~ "das nächste Mal"; "warmes Essen" ~ "das warme Essen". The difference seems to be in-/definite, cp. "ein letzt-e-s Mal" [encore], "ein warm-e-s Essen" (also "ein-e warm-e-_ Mahlzeit*). It should be obvious that a definitive das nächste Mal is nevertheless uncertain to a degree. The difference to the indefinite variant is as fuzzy as that between Konjunktiv or Future forms and the like, as far as expressions of Evidentiallity are concerned. Germanic is not exactly the prime example of an evidential language, that can--obviously--become qualified through adverbial gradiations, just for example.

PS: Insbesondere "insbesonder-e/s" shows that in was morphemic Also "indess".


There is no difference between both.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.