As far as I know, du is used to mention a direct object and dir is to mention an indirect object. If that is the case, why do they use "Wie geht's dir?" to ask "How are you?", when "you" is a direct object in the sentence "How are you?". Reference

  • 1
    "You" is the subject in that sentence... not the direct object
    – Emanuel
    Jul 6, 2014 at 19:29
  • 3
    "Wie geht's" is the equivalent of "how are you" but the words are a contraction from gehen, to go. So it's actually asking "how goes it?" It's constructed to ask how "it" is affecting "you," making it dative.
    – NL7
    Jul 7, 2014 at 15:36

5 Answers 5


In German, every verb can “rule” 1 or 2 objects (relative verb) or none (absolute verb). Some verbs support two or all of these variants, but often vary their meaning then. Relative verbs determine the case their objects have to be in; this is called valency. Almost all verbs require a subject, but impersonal verbs limit this to es. Objects here is used in a wider sense, because a verb may also support (or need) an adverb (or adverbial phrase), a prepositional phrase (i.e. certain prepositions which then determine the case of the nominal phrase following) or, following a copula verb, a predicative.

Most relative verbs that can (or must) rule a single accusative object are transitive verbs which can be used properly in (transient) passive voice.

Some relative verbs, mostly ones which require a single dative object, also support to reuse their subject(s) as an object with pronouns mich, dich, sich; uns, euch, sich ‘…self’. These are either reflexive verbs or reciprocal verbs. The latter require a subject that has more than one individual in its extension, i.e. plurals or groups, and are better used with the pronoun einander ‘each other’. There are also some verbs that can only be used with reflexive or reciprocal objects.

The valency of a verb determines how a sentence it appears in may be formed. Most combinations are possible:

  • absolute: Ich lebe.
  • Acc: Ich sehe sie.
    • Acc+Acc: Ich lehre ihn das Tanzen. (few verbs, gradually changing to Dat+Acc)
    • Acc+Gen: Ich beschuldige ihn der Untreue.
    • Acc+PP: Ich erinnere euch an etwas.
    • Acc+Adv: Ich hänge das Bild schief auf.
    • Acc+Pred: Ich finde die Frage gut.
    • Acc+Inf: Ich sehe ihn kommen.
  • Dat: Ich helfe dir.
    • Dat+Acc: Ich gebe dir einen Rat.
    • Dat+PP: Ich helfe dir bei einem Problem.
    • Dat+Adv: Es geht mir gut.
  • Gen: Ich gedenke ihrer. (being gradually replaced by Dat)
  • PP: Ich träume von der Weltherrschaft.
    • PP+PP: Ich laufe mit dir um die Wette.
  • Adv: Ich wohne hier.
    • Adv+PP: Ich gehe sorgsam mit Fragen um. (rare)
    • Adv+Adv: Es geht hier heiß her. (only with es as subject)
  • Pred: Ich bin nett.
  • Inf: Ich gehe schlafen.
  • reflexive: Wir freuen uns.
  • reciprocal: Wir erfreuen einander.
  • impersonal: Es friert.
    • Obj: Mich friert.
    • Obj+Obj: Mich friert es. = Es friert mich.

More complex schemes usually include optional elements, and this list doesn’t claim to be complete. One could analyze things differently of course, e.g. treat PP as complex objects in the case the preposition demands (but this would result in incongruences like ich gehe mit dir and ich gehe ohne dich). Most constructs with two objects in Acc/Dat/Gen are rarely used, the second one being replaced by a PP, Adv or Inf.

Questions use the same cases as answers, i.e. statements, but usually require different word order. If any, the case is found in the interrogative pronoun(s).


To finally answer the question: the valency of gehen if used to describe a feeling is Dat+Adv and it must be used impersonally then, hence es or ’s. The interrogative pronoun wie? is used to ask for adverbials. Wie geht es dir?

Interestingly, however, the dative object is optional in a question, because it defaults to the addressee by situational context: Wie geht’s?

  • 1
    "Acc+Acc: Ich zeige euch die deutsche Grammatik." This is Dat+Acc ("Wem zeige ich die deutsche Grammatik?").
    – celtschk
    Jul 6, 2014 at 15:24
  • You should add a "Too long didn't read"-marker before the penultimate paragraph. Also, "an die Wand" is a PP too. And why not add PP+PP+PP, or PP + Adv+ PP or "reflexive + PP"? And where are the zu-infinitives? I really find the listing arbitrary and counterproductive because there is no reason for exactly this listing. Could be longer, could be shorter, would make no difference. You should limit it to the cases. Oh and another thing... there are very few "transitive verbs"... especially in English. There is only "transitive use". -1
    – Emanuel
    Jul 6, 2014 at 19:41
  • @celtschk: Oops, would anyone believe that was a joke? I will update the examples, also Acc+Adv.
    – Crissov
    Jul 6, 2014 at 20:54
  • "few verbs, gradually changing to Dat+Acc": can you provide examples of this?
    – Giorgio
    Jul 8, 2014 at 17:17
  • @Giorgio, the example above is often seen and heard as ich lehre ihm das Tanzen instead (or it would be if it wasn’t a made-up example).
    – Crissov
    Jul 9, 2014 at 9:01

Don't compare German to English. In German we're not talking about direct and indirect objects. What we concern about are cases:

  • nominative
  • accusative
  • dative
  • genitive

The question "Wie geht es dir?" is an example of dative. And the dative form of du is dir.

In many cases you can consider the German dative case being an indirect object and the German accusative case being a direct object. This is often true; but as you've just seen, there are exceptions. Another popular one, for instance, is Ich danke dir (translation: Thank you).

Also note that the accusative object(~direct object) is dich not du as you suggested in your question.

  • What kind of verbs needs to add dich/mich/ after them?
    – Stallman
    Jul 1, 2017 at 10:42

Don't expect every expression to be translatable word-for-word between German and English. The German expression Wie geht's dir? could be considered a shortened version of Wie geht es mit dir? (Literally, How goes it with you?)

Mit is a preposition that takes a dative complement.

  • 1
    This is the only answer that is anywhere near right, so far. The expression doesn't say "How are you?", it says "How goes it with you?". The idea of "with you" or "for you" is expressed by the dative case alone. It's really as simple as that. +1 for you!
    – MPW
    Jul 7, 2014 at 2:18
  • 2
    "mit"? You gotta be kidding. In this context "mit" is wrong (in Standard German). The phrase "Wie geht es mit dir" is incomplete; you could, for example, ask: "Wie geht es mit dir weiter?" This asks for something in the future.
    – Em1
    Jul 7, 2014 at 7:57
  • Ich würde eher "Wie ergeht es Dir" als "Wie geht es mit Dir" extrapolieren. "Ergehen" musste ich dann nachschlagen (dict.leo.org) und fand wenig Bekanntes. "To fare well/bad" ist natürlich vertraut, aber "How do you fare" lässt sich daraus wohl kaum bilden. "Fare well, my lovely" ist Chandler, oder? Apr 23, 2020 at 14:35

The closest English translation employing the same grammatical mode is "how are things going for you?"

Just like you could not leave out the "for" in the English expression, because it is not a direct object, it is also not a direct object in German.

In "wie geht es dir", nothing happens to whoever is referred to by "dir". The person behind "dir" is thus not a semantical patiens, a person to whom something happens.


Simple: "Wie geht's dir?" is a contraction of "Wie geht es dir?", which translates directly into "How is it going for you?"; "dir" being the dative form of "du", ie, the "for you" part.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.