I was told that the first e in "leben" or "stehen" or "sehr" are pronounced like the e in "pet" (Eng.).

However, all German singers and speakers seem to pronounce it like the i in "Licht (Ger.)", therefore "leben" sounds exactly like "lieben" to me!

What's the correct pronunciation?

  • 8
    Which singers and speakers are you referring to? Do you have a Youtube link?
    – vog
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 13:47
  • Every! Literally EVERY! Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 14:00
  • 1
    I guess this is actually a duplicate of german.stackexchange.com/questions/20035/…, but I preferred to answer it.
    – Carsten S
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 17:08
  • 1
    @Crissov, I disagree for leben.
    – Carsten S
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 17:35
  • 1
    Aye, damn Saxons Commented Aug 27, 2015 at 16:53

4 Answers 4


The first e in "leben", "stehen" and "sehr" is a long e and thus pronounced like the "a" in "late" without the "-y" sound.

The e in "pet" is a short e that you can find in the last e of "leben" and "stehen".

In no case an "e" is pronounced like "i" in "Licht". In particular, "leben" and "lieben" are pronounced differently. There's normally no danger to confuse them. The singers you are referring to probably speak some dialect. Or, they took some artistic freedom in their pronounciation.

  • 1
    Isn't the second e in "leben" pronounced like the second e in "seven (Eng)"??? Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 14:01
  • 1
    @LibéchtWang: Yes I would agree to say that the second 'e' is almost spelled like the second 'e' in seven or like in "big ben".
    – bkausbk
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 14:07
  • 2
    The "a" in "late" — /leɪt/ — is short and represents /eɪ/ and is, hence, different to the "e" in "leben" — /'leːbən/ — which is, as you said, long and represents /eː/. From a German ear prospective I would rather say that the second e is similar in sound, as both have a perceivable "ä"-sound.
    – Em1
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 14:10
  • 1
    @LibéchtWang: Maybe this YouTube video helps? At least the first few seconds, during which the video title is read out. Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 14:21
  • 6
    There's normally no danger to confuse them. – If your ears (or rather the responsible parts of your brain) aren’t trained to a certain phonetical distinction, it may be surprisingly difficult to make it. For example being a native speaker of German, I find it very difficult to recognise the geminated (or long) k of Italian.
    – Wrzlprmft
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 16:32

The e in Leben is long, so it is quite different from the e in pet, which, if my understanding of English pronunciation is correct, is more like the short ä in hätte.

The German long e is also different from the German long i as in Lieben. For a German there is no danger of confusing them. If your native language does not have both of these or does not distinguish them, then it can however be hard to hear the difference. English for example has very few long monophtongs and none that corresponds to the German e. This will depend on the dialect, though. According to Wikipedia, a Scottish pronunciation of play can have this vowel. You can also go looking for it in this chart.

  • Wait, the wikipedia page you gave me says that Chinese Mandarin has that sound: [feɪ̯˥]. I'm a native speaker, but I still think the e in [feɪ̯˥] and the e in "Leben" sound completely different! I'm so confused! Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 17:41
  • @LibéchtWang, I think that if it is shorter and followed by another vowel it will just seem different. But I cannot say how accurate the Wikipedia information ist.
    – Carsten S
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 17:45
  • English for example has very few long monophtongs and none that corresponds to the German e. – The German e is part of Received Pronunciation of all things.
    – Wrzlprmft
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 17:59
  • @Wrzlprmft, that is short, right? But indeed, RP has more long monophtongs, but it is not spoken anymore ;) I have to say though, that I once made an attempt at understanding English vowels, but gave up at some point.
    – Carsten S
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 18:02
  • @CarstenS: Yes, it’s short (or part of a diphthong).
    – Wrzlprmft
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 18:02

Please don't take this YouTube video you mention in your comment as an example. This is a guy who is trying his best but he definitely is a dialect speaker (what more or less all of us are) who tries hard to sound 'standard' (which doesn't exist anyways IMHO - but in lack of a better word).

Just listen to the difference in sound of the two vowels 'I' when he points them out to be exactly the same by his phonetic symbols.

ca. min 3:50 -> Du ähnelst ihm wirklich kein bisschen

Talking about 'wirklich' and 'bisschen'.

-> The two 'i' in 'wirklich' sound very different. The former is a mixture between the german 'Umlaute' ö/ü and the i and the latter is more like the 'i' he explains earlier to be an 'ie' (though a little shorter) - same for the first pointed out one in 'bisschen'...

The most obvious difference in pronouncing german standard HOCHSPRACHE and austrian standard HOCHSPRACHE or however you might call them (let's don't get lost in translation and technical terms) is not bound to political borders (the differentiating terms german/austrian are not chosen very wisely) but it's clearly audible to make a generalization.

'Germans' have their tongues slightly more back in their throats when they are speaking - 'Austrians' (not in the west but the further you go east) more up against their palates and slightly closer to their teeth.

And this is exactly what makes the big difference between the 'ö/ü' sound and the 'i' sound (like in english to see/the sea).

For the german 'e' the tendency is even stronger towards an open short 'ö/e' - Austrians tend to pronounce it more closed without the ö/ü color in it.

The guy tries his best but however you can hear the difference - imagine the real world - there the difference is gigantic and to a sensible ear of a foreigner with more awareness of these diffs of vowels this might lead to confusion.

leben - lieben (written)
leeeben - liiieben (Austrian)
löööbön - lüüüben (German)

Of course - I am shamelessly exaggerating in the orthography to bring across the point ;-) But if you put the vocal track of this video in an audio-editor (or even better in a sampler) and trimmed it to the edges of the vowels, you could play back the sound samples on a keyboard like a D.J. and you would hear

-> ö - ö - ö - ö respectively ü - ü - ü - ü (german)
-> ee - ee - ee - ee respectively ii - ii - ii - ii (austrian)

It takes one word (preferably with e and i in it) to tell if one belongs to the german sounding group or the austrian sounding group. Not two words or a phrase - no diffs in grammar or usage of localisms. Just the sound of their i and e identifies them unmistakable...

If you are curios I collected a few snips of the diversities of our language (written) ->


  • And I don't wanna discourage you at all. It is not important which color of 'standard' you use. Every german speaker in Austria/Gerany/Italy/Swiss - even Belgium and Holland - will understand you. Just be prepared when pumping into indigenous folks - you might be completely lost if they don't do their best - they will, however understand you in any case... ;-)
    – mramosch
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 17:39
  • Uh, I'm talking about a vowel in Hochsprache, not dialects, you know? Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 17:49
  • @LibéchtWang: Well, the post talks only about Hochsprache ;-)
    – mramosch
    Commented Aug 26, 2015 at 19:14

The observation that the vowel quality of long [eː] as in leben is virtually identical to the quality of short [ɪ] as in Licht is correct, as can be shown by artificially lengthening or shortening the respective vowels and comparing the results:

The vowel quality of long [iː] as in lieben, however, is different, as artificial lengthening or shortening will show:

So for a correct pronunciation, you can pronounce [eː] and [ɪ] with the same vowel quality, as long as you keep the quantity distinction. On the other hand, [iː] should have a different vowel quality.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.