1

I've been wanting to translate a sentence:

He needs more time to reply to your letter.

Here's what I've written:

Er braucht mehr Zeit, um auf Ihren Brief zu antworten.

I wanted to inquire if it's okay to use another preposition after um.

  • 1
    A possibility would be "Er braucht mehr Zeit, [um] Ihren Brief zu beantworten.". The "um" is optional in this case. – PerlDuck Nov 20 '16 at 15:22
  • Thanks, but why would it be optional? Doesn't the sentence imply the 'in order to' construction? – ali_ runnindis Nov 20 '16 at 15:25
2

Yes, because this um is not a preposition. It's a subordinating sentence conjunction. There are various morphs in German that can be either, and it's not a problem to combine them like this if the syntax allows it.

You can even combine two instances of the same morph when it fuilfills different roles, like this:

Ich brauche zwei Stunden, um um den See zu laufen

This might be slightly dispreferred for reasons of euphony, but syntactically it's perfectly okay.

| improve this answer | |
  • But it’s not a sentence conjunction either. um den See zu laufen is not a sentence, neither is um um den see zu laufen. – Jan Nov 20 '16 at 19:44
  • The structure is an "Infinitiv mit zu" (infinitive clause with "zu"), which is fairly common in German. And yes, it does no have to be "auf" after "um". – user1583209 Nov 20 '16 at 20:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.