8

How would you explain at what point using "sau-" for emphasis (z.B.: "Das ist saustark!") becomes somewhat offensive or vulgar with some word combinations?

  • 3
    Personally: never. That's why this is a comment, and not an answer. ;-) – Jürgen A. Erhard Jan 6 '12 at 23:56
9

The aggravating prefix "sau-" is considered as colloquial the most. You would not use it in other than a family or friends setting.

According to Duden it is classified as rather strong ("derb") when used with a negative connotation.

Therefore in most situations I recommend not to use it

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    OK @takkat dann bitte das politisch korrekte Synonym für "Sauwetter" – bernd_k Jan 6 '12 at 13:29
  • 2
    @bernd_k: "Miserables Wetter"? – Jonas Jan 6 '12 at 14:11
  • 1
    @jonas akzeptabel im Gegensatz zu "Unwetter" was wohl nur von Nachrichtensprechern gebraucht wird, die nicht draußen und durchnässt sind – bernd_k Jan 6 '12 at 14:43
  • With appropriate family and friends, you wouldn't use it there too. – user unknown Jan 6 '12 at 19:14
  • 2
    @Takkat wenn du bis auf die Haut durchnässt noch von Schmuddelwetter sprichst, dann hast du eine ungewöhnlich gute Contenance. – bernd_k Jan 6 '12 at 21:48
9

It is not so much inappropriate, but it sounds pretty cheap.

"Saustark" and "saugut" are the most common forms to use "Sau-". In some commercial contexts you can hear "saugünstig".

The forms where it isn't appropriate are "saudoof", "saudumm" and other combinations... where it is used to say "dumb like a pig".

| improve this answer | |
5

I can't think of any word combinations, where "sau-" would be considered vulgar. In some situations you might not use it because of its very informal register.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.