2

There are often verbs which are both seperable and inseperable at the same time (often with prefixes like über). One verb conjugator gives a seperate conjugation of beigeben listing it as inseparable for subordinate clauses and seperable in main clauses. Is this a rule I haven't encountered yet? Scanning google did not offer an explanation based on my search guesses. Does that ever determine which to use when the verbs are listed as both separable and inseparable?

  • 2
    In my opinion (and in the opinion of most dictionaries) e.g. umfahren and umfahren (separable and inseperable) are two different verbs that just happen to look the same. Sie sollen den Polizisten umfahren und nicht umfahren! – tofro Mar 29 '17 at 7:29
7

There are cases of verbs which seem to behave sometimes as separable and sometimes as not separable. However, these variants always differ in their primary stress. Examples:

umfahren = to drive around s.o.

umfahren = to knock s.o. down with a vehicle

übergehen = to pass s.o. over (e.g. for promotion)

übergehen = to turn into (e.g. argument into violence)

In all such cases, the meaning and stress pattern determines the behaviour. The separable variant always behaves as a separable verb and vice versa.

Note that "beigeben" is not one of these ambiguous forms: it is always a separable verb. (In fact, there are no non-separable verbs with the prefix "bei-" at all.) It's just that even separable verbs exhibit separation in some but not all forms.

| improve this answer | |
0

inseparable for subordinate clauses and seperable in main clauses

That's the normal behaviour of all separable verbs in main vs. sub-clauses.

Ich gab ihm etwas bei, vs Er, dem ich etwas beigab, ...

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.