An earlier question (see here) asked for the difference between Menschen and Leute. I would like to understand how "Volk" relates to these (like in the Reichstag inscription, see picture below). Is it more professional or something? I mean, it's carved on the Reichstag building, so it's pretty significant... Several dictionaries listed it as more 'folks', but I'm not sure that connotation matches things like this- enter image description here It seems like a very formal usage, at odds with a 'rustic folk' connotation.

How does this compare to the others? They all seem to mean "people," but with different connotations. What are the differences?

  • It's not obvious but I didn't vote close for the reason of being unclear. That question surely had been updated since the first close vote. – Em1 Jul 17 '17 at 7:23
  • @Em1 In what way can I change my question to reopen it? – Imperator Jul 17 '17 at 10:12
  • 1
    I have clarified the post, and nominate it for re-opening. – Tom Au Jul 17 '17 at 12:42
  • To my mind, make it explicitly asking for something not covered by dictionaries. My close vote was for being general reference. And the answer as is does not add anything valuable to dictionaries. Kinda an indicator that your question isn't that specific. On the other hand, you've got already 3 open votes, I guess it'll be open in a couple of hours anyway. — Also take note of a meta post I created with respect to the issue at hand: – Em1 Jul 17 '17 at 15:11

There is no word Volken, it's das Volk. It means »the people«, as in the first sentence of the U.S. constitution:

We the People …

Wir, das Volk …

Volk means the whole of the people of a country, in contrast to the individual people.

It's often used in a political context but also in compounds as Fußvolk, Bienenvolk, Volksfest, Volksbank, and Volkswagen.

  • 3
    One might add that it corresponds to the singular people, with plural peoples, not the uncountable people. – Carsten S Jul 16 '17 at 19:57
  • Perhaps helpful for understanding: das Volk (Nom.), des Volkes (Gen.), dem Volke (Dat.), das Volk (Akk.). Die Völker (Nom.), der Völker (Gen.), den Völkern (Dat.), die Völker (Akk.). – Christian Geiselmann Jul 16 '17 at 23:26
  • 1
    Statt auf die Rechtschreibung einzugehen, die nicht die Frage, wenn auch fragwürdig war, solltest Du die Frage bzgl. der Rechtschreibung korrigieren und dann beantworten, was gefragt ist. Sonst zieht sich die Rechtschreibfehlerdiskussion durch den Thread und hält die Leute sogar vom Korrigieren ab, weil das die Themenverfehlung der Antworten dann umso deutlcher hervorhebt. – user unknown Jul 17 '17 at 15:31
  • Ich sehe nicht, wo ich mehr als unbedingt nötig auf der Rechtschreibung rumgeritten hätte. – Janka Jul 17 '17 at 20:09

Volk refers to people in the "ethnic" or national sense of the word. The reference to rustic "folk" is actually a formal one (even if you don't believe that rustic folk themselves are formal).

Leute is a collective noun referring to "people" generally, not to specific kinds, or groups of people, like Volk.

Menschen is the plural of individuals, and is better translated as "persons," than as "people."

  • So if I was, say, a Canadian national in Germany, at first I would only fall under Leute until I fit into culture a bit more, then become Volk? – Imperator Jul 17 '17 at 21:00
  • @Imperator: If you are with Canadians, singing the Canadian national anthem, you would be a member of the Canadian "Volk." But if you are with a group of "random" people of different nationalities at a sports event, then I'd use "Leute." The exception might be, if everyone else were German, and you had "naturalized" German, then you would also be part of the German "Volk" rather than random "Leute." – Tom Au Jul 17 '17 at 21:05
  • Interesting. Thank you for the great answer! – Imperator Jul 17 '17 at 21:06
  • 1
    @Imperator: You can accept my answer if you like it. – Tom Au Jul 17 '17 at 21:07
  • 2
    Let's not be hasty here ;) – Imperator Jul 17 '17 at 21:08

Volk shares its root with English folk. Not surprisingly, it has the same meaning as the English word (as defined at in several aspects.
In a plain and general sense, it divides people into groups of culture, history, descent or language.

The word, however, covers much more meaning than this. The population or citizens are a Volk (das deutsche Volk). And so is a herd of animals, a swarm of insects etc. (Bienenvolk).
And the working or lower classes (the common people) are called Volk (gewöhnliches Volk). In the latter case, you can interchange the word with the other words.

Except for the sense of "lower or working classes", there's a plural: "Völker".

For reference:

The difference between Menschen and Leute is already well covered in the question you linked. And there's also a question covering the difference between Personen und Menschen: "Personen" or "Menschen".

Hence, here's just a very short summary:

Leute is basically a collective noun and means people in general. It shares some meaning with Volk and Menschen when it comes to the sense of "common people".
But it can be used for any group of random people. Like "guy" in "you guys" or "folk" in "Hey folks". It's also used for family or friends ("Meine Leute"). Both senses are unique to Leute and neither Volk nor Mensch(en) can be used here.

Finally, Menschen is the plural of Mensch which represents a human individuum. Both Volk and Leute cannot refer to a single person.

  • "Single individuum" is a bit of a tautology. Perhaps better write ... which - in one of its meanings - represents a human individual. (There is also the meaning of Mensch as for the species.) – Christian Geiselmann Jul 18 '17 at 12:07
  1. Leute = a group of Menschen
  2. Menschen = the beings belonging to the species Homo Sapiens Sapiensis
  3. Volk = a group of Leute that have a certain ethnic background. Related to tribe/Stamm.

Also see Abstammung.ämmige

Normally a Volk belongs to one Nation-State/Area of settlement. See point two:

  • So a Volk is a group of group of Menschen? – Quidam Feb 28 at 12:34

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.