German Language Stack Exchange is a bilingual question and answer site for speakers of all levels who want to share and increase their knowledge of the German language. It's 100% free, no registration required.
Sign up to join this community
I want to ask a person: "Why are you coming to Berlin? As a tourist or for job?" Is it right to ask:
Which one is the right answer?
I think the first one, because nachkommen is meant "später kommen, hinter jemandem hergehen, herfahren" in the Duden Wörterbuch.
This can be translated quite literally, though you have a small mistake in your thoughts.
Do you come to Berlin as a tourist or for job?
Kommen Sie nach Berlin als Tourist oder beruflich?
Kommen Sie als Tourist nach Berlin oder beruflich?
Kommen Sie als Tourist oder beruflich nach Berlin?
The nach here doesn't come from nachkommen, but from to. Due to the liberties that the German language has in word ordering, all 3 of my given translations are correct and I wouldn't even say that one is better or more frequently used than the others.
If it were nachkommen, the sentence would be
Kommen Sie Berlin nach als Tourist oder beruflich?
meaning something like
Do you follow after Berlin as a tourist or for job?
making no sense, as you recognized correctly.
EDIT: I just recognized again the title of you question. That's exactly the point: kommen nach is not equal to nachkommen.
The following sentences are all correct and have absolutely the same meaning:
Kommen Sie nach Berlin als Tourist oder beruflich?
Kommen Sie als Tourist oder beruflich nach Berlin?
Kommen Sie als Tourist nach Berlin, oder beruflich?
But the last one sounds as if you originally just wanted to ask "Kommen Sie als Tourist nach Berlin?" and decided later to add "oder beruflich?".
Note that the verb of all these sentences is kommen, nicht nachkommen. Also pay attention to the fact that nach Berlin is not separated. In this case the word nach is a preposition to Berlin: nach Berlin = to Berlin
In contrast to that, the nach in nachkommen is not a preposition but a (separable) part of the verb nachkommen; in finite forms of the verb this part moves to the end of the sentences. Like in the following examples:
Peter kommt seiner Reisegruppe später nach.
Kommt Peter seiner Reisegruppe später nach?
And of course, you can combine the preposition nach and the verb nachkommen in the same sentences:
Nach Berlin kommt Peter später nach.
Peter kommt später nach Berlin nach.
2 is correct.
1 is incorrect because kommen with a destination cannot be used without a preposition.
In sentence #2 the verb is kommen, not nachkommen. Because in that sentence, nach is a preposition to Berlin, so it's not part of the verb.
If you wanted to use nachkommen, it would be:
*Kommen Sie Berlin als Tourist oder beruflich nach?
which would be correct grammar but wrong semantically because as you correctly stated nachkommen means "to come after" (also "to comply").
