German Language Stack Exchange is a bilingual question and answer site for speakers of all levels who want to share and increase their knowledge of the German language. It's 100% free, no registration required.
Sign up to join this community
Could someone please clarify somethting about the following sentence, taken out of a work by Roald Dahl?
über die ein gewaltiger Wasserfall herabdonnerte, in gischtsprühende und wild wirbelnde Strudel hinein
Why does 'wild' not agree with Strudel? (It has no ending.) Is it because it is used as an adverb and not an adjective?
Is it because it is used as an adverb and not an adjective?
Yes. It is used to describe “wirbelnde” which is the Partizip I of “wirbeln”. Adverbs are used elaborate on actions described by verbs, even if they are used in the Partizip I.
If you consider this example
die deshalb heute abreisende Frau
it becomes more obvious. “Deshalb” and “heute” are both adverbs and refer to “abreisende” (and cannot possibly refer to “Frau” as “die deshalb Frau” is grammatically impossible).
