4

I use a variety of online german dictionaries and I am curious about an aspect of the format. With entries that are verbs, the word in question typically has three conjugated examples next to it. It tends to look something like this:

pla·nen (planst, plante, hat geplant) planen VERB (mit OBJ)

The convention seems to be to include the 2nd person present indicative, the first person past tense, and the third person present perfect.

My question is why is this? if someone could give me some insight as to the logic of this convention, I would be immensely grateful.

|improve this question
  • Related question for substantive entries and genitive. – guidot Aug 2 '18 at 12:40
  • My printed dictionary has no additional forms for planen, since these are regular, but all mentioned ones by Eller for laufen. – guidot Aug 2 '18 at 12:44
11

It gives you complete information about the verb's conjugations.

Planen is not a good example, because it's regular. Let's take laufen (to run):

Laufen: läufst, lief, ist gelaufen.

Based on these three forms you know now all irregularities of the verb:

  • in 2nd and 3rd singular present "-au-" changes to "-äu-" (du läufst, er läuft)
  • in Präteritum (und Konjunktiv II) "-au-" changes to "-ie-" (ich lief, es lief, wir liefen, not ich *laufte, wir *lauften)
  • Partizip II is "gelaufen" (not *gelauft)
  • Perfekt is composed with "sein" and not with "haben" (ich bin gelaufen, not ich habe gelaufen)
|improve this answer
  • 1
    All common irregularities. There are verbs which are still a bit more off, as the auxiliaries are or some verbs with two different past participles. But that's noted in the dictionary, too. – Janka Aug 2 '18 at 12:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.