When I started learning German, I read that the usual ordering of adverbials in a sentence is time—manner—place. However, in the sentence:

Das Mädchen hat gestern in Berlin gut gesungen.
(The girl sang well in Berlin yesterday.)

"gut" is a manner adverb and is usually positioned in the end of the sentence (together with the end verb bracket). Why?

I thought that "gut" might be a predicative, which comes at the end of the middle field of a sentence; but it is not one here, as far as I can tell, because a predicative needs to be connected to the subject using a copula verb such as "sein", "werden", or "bleiben".

Note: I am aware that German only has strict ordering rules for verbs. All the other rules of word ordering in a sentence are in fact only descriptions of the usual word ordering and could be ignored for emphasis at will.


Criticism of time–manner–place

I know this rule is widely taught, but it is utter nonsense. Let's examine the examples given on Wikipedia.

Ich fahre heutetime mit dem Automanner nach Münchenplace.
I'm travelling to Munichplace by carmanner todaytime.

Now isn't this neat? German word order is the inverse of the English one. Typologists start salivating, as this reversal pairs nicely with the one observed for verbs.

weil das Ergebnis respektiert3 werden2 muß1
because the result must1 be2 respected3

Unfortunately, it is fiction.

  1. nach München is a direction, not a place, and German grammar distinguishes sharply between the two.

  2. nach München is not a modifier (an adjunct in linguistic parlance; Angabe in German), but an argument (complement, Ergänzung). Modifiers and arguments behave differently.

A simple but famous example to show the difference between places and directions.

Sie hat im Zimmer getanzt.
Sie ist ins Zimmer getanzt.

A direction such as ins Zimmer forces a locomotory meaning on the verb tanzen, which in turn changes the auxiliary in the past from haben to sein.

Directional complements such as nach München, ins Zimmer prefer to appear on the far right of the sentence, as do locational complements.

weil er sich in letzter Zeit häufiger dienstlich in München aufgehalten hat

Now let's move on to your sentence.

Das Mädchen hat gestern in Berlin gut gesungen.

The important thing to note is that gestern in Berlin (preferably in that order, although the reverse is possible) is a modifier that situates the entire event the sentence is talking about. Modifiers of this kind tend to appear relatively far to the left. Note that gestern in Berlin can appear in first position; this indicates that time and place can fuse together in order to situate an event.

Gestern in Berlin hat sie wieder wunderbar gesungen.

Adjuncts such as gut, wunderbar and zusammen in the following sentence do not serve to situate an event. Their role is to modify a verb, and they consequently occur relatively far to the right, where the verb is located — but still in front of directional complements.

Wir sind am Wochenende zusammen ans Meer gefahren.

The difference between a place used as a situating adjunct and as a verbal adjunct can be observed in sentences such as the following:

als wir damals in Riminisituating zusammen im Meerverbal adjunct geschwommen sind

An overview of the complexities involved can be gleaned from the IDS grammar; note the distinction between kontextspezifizierende Satzadverbialia and Verbgruppenadverbialia.

What to learn instead

1. Certain complements appear as far to the right as possible. This includes adverbial and prepositional complements.

während seine Frau immer noch gemütlich im Bett liegt
wenn am Wochenende wieder eine Horde Fußballfans durch die Stadt zieht
ob der Wert solcher Veranstaltungen wirklich nur im Erfahrungsaustausch besteht

2. Temporal and local adjuncts that serve to orient the listener appear far to the left. The order they appear in can vary.

Ob in der Stadt am Wochenende wieder so viel los ist?
Ob am Wochenende in der Stadt wieder so viel los ist?

3. A sentence can have multiple temporal and local adjuncts, which are interpreted differently: Those to the left situate the entire event, those to the right modify the verb.

als wir in Rimini tatsächlich einmal zusammen im Meer schwammen
weil wir damals leider fast nie am Wochenende weggefahren sind

| improve this answer | |
  • The German level of the referenced material is higher than I expected for an intermediate student, that probably explains why a lot of teachers teach the oversimplified time-manner-place rule. Anyway, it is possible to understand it with the help of a translator/dictionary. I have found a similar (but with simpler language and more concise) explanation in "Hammer's German Grammar and Usage" book and really recommend it. – Alan Evangelista Apr 22 '19 at 20:42
  • 1
    One thing I do not understand is why German grammar terminology for word ordering is different across different grammar materials (eg Satzadverbialia und Verbgruppenadverbialia vs Umstandergänzung ). This complicates learning. – Alan Evangelista Apr 22 '19 at 20:45
  • Nothing of what you put in actually disproves anything about the generalization. – sgf Apr 23 '19 at 9:37
  • @sgf You need to be a little more explicit in your criticism. I tried to show that certain kinds of complements (among them locational and directional ones) appear as far to the right as possible. Yet the time-manner-place rule does not even distinguish between adjuncts and complements. I also tried to show that adjuncts that serve to specify the (local and temporal) context of an event appear far to the left, which contradicts the rule in question, as it claims places come last. I also mentioned in passing that these kinds of adjuncts are not strongly ordered (hier gestern is fine). – David Vogt Apr 23 '19 at 9:59
  • @DavidVogt Sorry, I was really vague there. From reading your answer, my impression was that your argument is this: 1. The TMP rule claims that the ordering is time-manner-place. 2. But in examples for the rule, directions are used instead of places. 3. Places gramatically aren't directions. 4. Therefore, the TMP rule is nonsense. But my impression is that the TMP rule holds pretty well as long as we are only looking at modifiers, and only at modifiers modifying the same thing. – sgf Apr 23 '19 at 10:06

Time-reason-manner-place is often the neutral order. However, simple adverbs tend to describe the thing they are preceding. They are similar to nicht in this way:

Das Mädchen hat gestern in Berlin gut gesungen.

Das Mädchen hat gestern in Berlin nicht gesungen.

This is both about the singing, obviously.

Das Mädchen hat gestern gut in Berlin gesungen.

Das Mädchen hat gestern nicht in Berlin gesungen.

These are more about the fact in Berlin.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.