3

For example, what does the sentence: “Ich musste es immer und immer wieder mit ansehen.” Is there a difference between these two: “Mit ansehen” and «mitansehen”?

4

There is a difference between mit ansehen and mitansehen, but it seems that even native speakers, and also translators, find it difficult to distinguish these correctly.

The phrase mit ansehen means to watch something together with others, and the stress is on mit. It doesn't matter if this is done forcefully or voluntarily:

  • Kommst du den Film mit ansehen?
    (Do you want to join us watching the movie?)

The compound verb mitansehen means watching in the sense of witnessing, and the stress in on the syllable an. Here, it doesn't matter if this is done alone or together with others:

  • Sie musste die grausame Tat mitansehen.
    (She had to witness the crual deed.)

So, the English sentence "I had to watch it over and over again" can be interpreted in two difference ways in German: you watch something again and again with others (mit ansehen) or you witness something again and again (mitansehen).

  • Ich musste es immer und immer wieder mit ansehen.
  • Ich musste es immer und immer wieder mitansehen.
| improve this answer | |
  • "the stress in on the letter a." Better: the stress in on the syllable an. – mic Oct 28 '19 at 15:04
  • @mic, thank you. – Björn Friedrich Oct 28 '19 at 16:03
  • Und wenn man etwas nur ansieht, nicht mitansieht, dann ist man kein Zeuge? – user unknown Oct 28 '19 at 23:13
1

It means that you are forced to notice something that you don't want to notice, or that something happens (to you or someone you care about) and you can't do anything about it, except watching.

I wouldn't write the words "mit ansehen" together.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.