2

The question is about the following sentence:

Darüber hinaus können Ereignisse auch von Zeituhren, dies können beispielsweise einmalige Termine, sein.

AFAIK the attribute of "Zeituhren" should be "...Zeituhren, dies können beispielsweise einmalige Termine sein, sein". Am I wrong here? Is there any special rule, so you can omit the last verb if it would be there twice?

5
  • 1
    Are the “einmalige Termine” an example of “Ereignisse” or “Zeituhren” ? – Stephie Mar 22 at 13:50
  • @Stephie "einmalige Termine" are an example for "Zeituhren" – gkhaos Mar 22 at 14:37
  • 1
    Rephrasing, so that you don't need to repeat it, would be an alternative imho. – c.p. Mar 22 at 16:03
  • Regardless of grammar, you shouldn't nest sentences too deep. – RalfFriedl Mar 23 at 9:21
  • but the question is about grammar, not about best practices – gkhaos Mar 23 at 10:39
8

No, omitting verbs is not valid, just because they would be repeated. In the given example the verb is required on each side of the comma.

Practically this the question appears quite seldom. In your example the verb corresponding to Ereignisse should probably read herrühren, stammen or similar. There are other options like shortening the subordinate clause to beispielsweise einmalige Termine.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.