Man kann über das Gebäude sehen.


Man kann über dem Gebäude sehen.

I'm not sure if „über“ is accusative or dative in this sentence, please help and please explain why it is dative/accusative. Thank you!

  • "Man kann über dem Gebäude sehen" (one can see above the building) is not correct. But "Man kann etwas über dem Gebäude sehen" (one can see something above the building) would be okay.
    – Paul Frost
    Commented Mar 30, 2021 at 23:11

2 Answers 2


The standard rule is always the same:

  • Dative case for places
  • Accusative case for directions

So, when you see a balloon hovering above a building, then you are looking at a place above the building, and then you need dative case:

Ich sehe den Ballon über dem Gebäude.
I see the balloon above the building.

But but if you are on a hill near the building, on a place higher than the roof of the building, and you look at something behind the building, then your view "moves" over the building, so we have a direction and therefore we need accusative case:

Ich kann über das Gebäude sehen.
I can see over the building.


In the first sentence, "Man kann über das Gebäude sehen" (You can look over the building), you can ask "Über wen kann man sehen?", which indicates that the accusative is used here.

In the second sentence, "Man kann über dem Gebäude sehen", you can ask "Über wem kann man (etwas) sehen", indicating the dative. Note, that this second sentence doesn't make entirely sense. In its current way, it would mean that once you are above the building, you are able to see. There would be more sense to it if the sentence was "Man kann etwas über dem Gebäude sehen" (you cann see something above the building). In this case, "dem Gebäude" is dative, "etwas" is accusative.

It just depends on the meaning. "über jemanden sehen" means you look over somebody, "etwas über jemandem sehen", you see something above somebody.

  • 3
    Using the corresponding questions helps at most a native speaker (it didn't help me as a kid to decide between "dem" and "den", I solved the issue by replacing the object with a feminine object). It is not something that works for people learning German as a foreign language. They are better helped by direction = accusative, place = dative.
    – user6495
    Commented Mar 29, 2021 at 5:44
  • @Roland: I was about to say that but you beat me to it. The wer/wen/wem/wessing thing is how they teach German speakers in school, leveraging the fact that they how to form questions intuitively. But German learners don't have that intuition. The question was also answered in terms of meaning, so still useful, but yes, the rest of it can be left out in this case.
    – RDBury
    Commented Mar 29, 2021 at 5:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.