When working with the Vorgangspassiv, would it be correct to view some potential general forms of the various tenses as follows (i know besides V2, word order is less strict in German, but nonetheless these could be considered correct, yes?)
Simple Present Passive:
Das Buch wird gelesen
[Subject] [conjugated present-tense of werden] [partizip II of main verb]
Present Perfekt Passive:
Das Buch ist gelesen worden
[Subject] [conjugated present tense of sein] [partizip II of main verb] worden.
Simple Past Passive:
Das Buch wurde gelesen
[subject] [conjugated simple past tense of werden] [partizip II of main verb]
Past Perfekt (plusquam perfekt) Passive:
Das Buch war gelesen worden
[Subject] [conjugated past tense of sein] [partizip II of main verb] worden.
Simple Future Passive (Future I):
Das Buch wird gelesen werden.
[subject] [conjugated present tense of werden] [partizip II of main verb] werden
Perfekt Future Passive (Future II):
Das Buch wird gelesen worden sein
[subject] [conjugated present tense of werden] [partizip II of main verb] worden sein
Question When a form of 'sein' is being used (for example, in the present perfekt passive example) is this just by coincidence that the verb takes sein and not haben? Or will such a construction always take sein? For example, in Future II active, the infinitive placed at the end of the sentence can be either haben/sein depending on which aux the verb takes in the present perfket tense.
so the question is, should the general form really be
[Subject] [conjugated present tense of sein/haben] [partizip II of main verb] worden.
Now, when working with Active Future I and Future II, is the following right?
Future I Active:
Ich werde das Buch lesen
[subject] [conjugated present tense of werden] [object if applicable] [inf. form of main verb]
Future II Active:
Ich werde das Buch gelesen haben
[subject] [conjugated present tense of werden] [object if applicable] [partizip II of main verb] haben/sein
Thanks