I would think Franz Liszt's surname would be pronounced "least" or "leasht," but according to this, it is pronounced "list." Is that true? If so, why?

  • 16
    Why should it be pronounced differently? Nov 21 '21 at 0:18
  • Why was the question downvoted?
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 21 '21 at 0:28
  • 6
    @PaulFrost The Number-Dativ question was also downvoted. Somebody doesn't have a great Saturday night..
    – choXer
    Nov 21 '21 at 0:36
  • 8
    In Polish the sz cluster is pronounced like English "sh". But Liszt wasn't Polish. As Paul Frost says, the spelling is Hungarian. Nov 21 '21 at 16:58
  • 1
    German sz = double s. More ß than ss.
    – gnasher729
    Nov 22 '21 at 15:43

The name is pronounced as the German word "List" which comes very close to the English word "list".

To understand it, you have to know that Franz Liszt was an Austrian-Hungarian composer. In Hungarian his name is Liszt Ferenc. In Hungarian "sz" is pronounced similarly as the German "ß", and in fact in former times the modern German letter "ß" was written as "sz". And up to now in "ß" is pronounced as "s - z" ("ess- tsett") when one pronounces the individual letters.

His father was Adam Liszt whose name is also spelled as Adam List which is of German origin. His professional career took place in the Kingdom of Hungary (see Wikipedia) which was part of the Austrian empire. In Hungarian the letter "s" is pronounced as the English "sh", and this explains the spelling with "sz": Adam Liszt wanted his name to be pronounced reasonably correctly.

Here you can listen to the German pronunciation and Hungarian pronunciation.

  • 2
    @GerardH.Pille When you spell a word, the letters are pronounced in a certain way which depends on the language (that is what I called phonetic alphabet). And for the letter "ß" one says "s - z".
    – Paul Frost
    Nov 21 '21 at 14:14
  • 18
    I think what you mean to say is that the name of the letter ß is pronounced "ess-zett" (which is the same as how you would pronounce "s z"). The English phrase "phonetic alphabet" has multiple meanings, but it definitely does not mean "the names of the letters as they are pronounced when you recite the alphabet out loud." I'm not sure exactly what you would call that in English—maybe I'd call it "the spoken alphabet." Nov 21 '21 at 15:21
  • 2
    The glyph "ß" itself derives from a digraph consisting of ſ (the long "s") and "z". (If you squint hard enough, the "stem" comes from the long "s" and the right side from the "z".)
    – chepner
    Nov 21 '21 at 17:09
  • 3
    @theonlygusti: I think "least" would be spelled liest in German. That's actually a word, the third person singular of lesen.
    – RDBury
    Nov 21 '21 at 20:11
  • 2
    The name "Eszett" for "ß" is not universal. It seems to be a geographic thing. It is also called "scharfes s".
    – glglgl
    Nov 22 '21 at 8:22

Yes, true. It's a name. It's pronounced as the person who bears it wants to see it pronounced.

Further, it follows the usual way a 'i' is pronounced in German when followed by a consonant: short like the 'i' in the English 'list'. The sz is a rare and antique way to denote the ß character when the ß is not available - but the ß actually is a ligature letter for the combination sz - either way, it is pronounced as the 's' in the English 'list', too.

  • 9
    The sz in Liszt's name is not an alternative way of denoting ß, but stemming from Hungarian: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sz_(digraph)#Hungarian Nov 22 '21 at 10:50
  • 1
    @jonathan.scholbach In this special case, it's rather a Hungarian transcription of the German name "List" (That Liszt's father brought to Hungary).
    – tofro
    Nov 24 '21 at 8:59
  • @jonathan.scholbach if you look up the history of how the letter ß came into being: it is a ligature. Hence also its name. The fact that in modern German you may not replace an ß wit sz anymore does not change history. Also the actual choice of List to change the spelling of his name to keep its pronounciation in a predominantly Hungarian society does not change pronounciation rules - and that's all I elaborate on. Nov 24 '21 at 9:04

"Least" and "list" are good approximations, because the vowel in Liszt sounds similar to the one in "least" but it is short like the one in "list".

least /liːst/

list /lɪst/

Liszt /list/

  • 6
    "least" has a long i, but Franz Liszt is pronounced with a short i. At least for me as a German, the two do not sound very similar.
    – Jan
    Nov 22 '21 at 8:44
  • @Jan I've always heard it pronounced with a long i. That's however mainly by Austrians...
    – jwenting
    Nov 22 '21 at 11:14
  • @jwenting this guy pronounces Liszt with a short i (about 48 seconds into the podcast). But then he is probably not Austrian.
    – Jan
    Nov 22 '21 at 11:50
  • The Hungarian pronunciation is exactly as @g.kertesz says: it is a short vowel, but with the quality of the English long vowel in least. Scots English pronounces least this way. (By the way, liszt means flour in Hungarian; but this is not the origin of the name Liszt.)
    – TonyK
    Nov 23 '21 at 22:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.