Why is accusative used with ein Pinguin
in the following sentence?
Man sollte immer einen Pinguin im Haus haben
Immer is an adverb, not a preposition.
German Language Stack Exchange is a bilingual question and answer site for speakers of all levels who want to share and increase their knowledge of the German language. It's 100% free, no registration required.
Sign up to join this communityWhy is accusative used with ein Pinguin
in the following sentence?
Man sollte immer einen Pinguin im Haus haben
Immer is an adverb, not a preposition.
Immer is simply an adverb and has no bearing as to case.
With immer, you're saying that one should always have a penguin in the house, without it, you're simply saying one should have a penguin in the house.
Akkusativ is used because haben is not a dative verb, and the penguin is the direct object, therefore it should be in the accusative case. The noun ein Pinguin is masculine, therefore it is declined as such:
Ich habe einen Pinguin
Du hast einen Pinguin
Er/sie/es hat einen Pinguin
etc.
The only difference is the addition of the modal verb sollen. Without it, you have this:
Man hat einen Pinguin
It does not depend on "immer" but on "sollte ... haben" (should have)
Man sollte einen Pinguin im Haus haben.
Man sollte {wen oder was?} im Haus haben.
"immer" is just a nice add-on:
without "immer":
Man sollte einen Pinguin im Haus haben.
You should have a penguin at home.
with "immer":
Man sollte immer einen Pinguin im Haus haben.
You always should have a penguin at home.