In my book, there is a differentiation of two types of personenbezeichnung made, it is categorized as primär and sekundär, however this is never explained further.

It's about semantics.


Primär: Mensch, Gast, Laie, Passagier, Insasse, Star, Flüchtling, Abkömmling, ...-ling

Sekundär: Vormund, Figur, Person, Putzkraft, ...-kraft, ...-hilfe, Wesen, Mitglied, Opfer, Individuum, Geschöpf.

I do not understand the difference between them. I have looked up "primär" and "sekundär" in this context but I can't find more about it. Note: It is in a professional publication by an educated author, so there is reason to understand this distinction.

  • 1
    I understand the idea but the examples make no sense.
    – Janka
    Sep 16 at 18:22
  • @Janka They are from the book winter-verlag.de/en/news/ni12950c933c188aabffeafdf/… I've not changed any. Page 39. Sep 16 at 18:50
  • I was about to ask: Could it be that the distinction is about which terms are masculine in a primary sort of way? For a moment I thought: the ones in the first set have masculine gender, but all in the second set are feminine or neuter... WAIT except "Vormund". But still?
    – Alazon
    Sep 16 at 19:39
  • @Alazon That is probably the way in which it was intended. Sep 16 at 19:45
  • 1
    I’m voting to close this question because it is not about the German language per se, but about (linguistic or philosophical?) concepts that are independent of a particular language. Sep 18 at 8:45

1 Answer 1


Primärbegriff and Sekundärbegriff are fundamental classifications for symbols in semantics. Here, those terms seem to be fenced in to symbols that denote persons.

  • 1
    What could be the reason for "Mitglied" being sekundär, while "Mensch" is primär? Sep 16 at 17:51
  • 1
    You would need to read about the theory of semantic symbols in human languages (the English term seems to be "primary and secondary symbols"). In principle, a primary symbol is the thing itself, very objectively without any influence of human perceiption, a secondary one is thats subjectively perceived with all possible assumptions not even in the term. Examples would be "man" as "male human" for a primary symbol, "teacher" primarily assumed to be a male teacher (even if it could be a female as well).
    – tofro
    Sep 16 at 21:53
  • Okay, thank you for the answer! Sep 16 at 22:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.