Which of the two following German translations for reverse chronological (as in: reverse chronological order)




is the correct form, or are both correct? Do they mean the same? Or is there a subtle distinction between anti- and a-?

  • 8
    I would actually say nicht chronologisch or in umgekehrter chronologischer Reihenfolge. – OregonGhost Jun 1 '11 at 12:02
  • Another way would be to say chronologisch ungeordnetor in verkehrter zeitlicher Reihenfolge. Though I would not use in verkehrter chronologischer Reihenfolge. – bernd_k Jun 1 '11 at 20:14
  • @Deve und Tim: Sieht "...isch" wie eine englsiche Endung aus? – user unknown Dec 21 '15 at 17:27
  • @userunknown Zu dem Zeitpunkt als wir unsere Kommentare gepostet haben, lautete die Frage noch anders, sh. Editierverlauf. – Deve Dec 21 '15 at 17:31
  • @Deve: Okay, habe sie als obsolet markiert. Kannst Deinen aber auch selbst löschen. – user unknown Dec 21 '15 at 18:48

They are both correct, but have different meanings.

The a-word construction indicates a lack of word, whereas the anti-word construction indicates something against word.

In your example, something which is "achronological" is something without a time-based order. For example, I could say my notebook is achronological, as I write on random pages on random days.

Something is "antichronological" (this is a odd word however) if it is in reverse chronological order. For example, if I wrote on my notebook from the last page to the first page, I could say it is antichronological.

  • Anti can mean "opposite to some direction", so here it could mean "opposite to the direction of time". It could also mean "opposite to some meaning/perspective/attitude". So one could also use this adjective for anything, that disturbs the chronological order. – Toscho Mar 2 '13 at 13:08

I don't think those words really exist in German. At least I couldn’t find them on duden.de.

The only context I found them (both) via Google was with CVs. So I guess it’s an anglicism that came to Germany with the American style CVs recently.

OregonGhost posted the correct translations in his comment. However, antichronologisch sounds wronger to my ears than achronologisch.

  • 1
    Yes, as I noted even in English "antichronological" is very weird. It is much more normal to see "reverse chronological" instead, which is a synonym. – Glen Wheeler Jun 1 '11 at 13:44
  • 1
    These are technical terms that are not listed in a dictionary like the Duden which aims at everyday users. Since many technical terms are created within an international society of scientists and technologists, and since many of these kinds of terms are created ad hoc and forgotten again, it would take extensive research to find out where they originated. – user1914 Mar 8 '13 at 13:23
  • I agree with @Toscho that putting "anti" in front of chronologisch is ambiguous. It could either mean "in reverse (chronological) order" or it could mean "not chronological" (the same as achronistisch). Therefore using this word composition just seems plain wrong to me. One should rather explain the intention more clearly, for example "in umgekehrt chronologischer Reihenfolge". – BatteryBackupUnit Jun 15 '15 at 9:20

The prefixes "a-" and "anti-" have different meanings. "achronological" means "not proceeding through time in an ordered fashion", while "antichronological" means "proceeding backwards through time".

Example: Most movies rewinded are antichronological, while e.g. Memento is achronological,


The best translation for reverse chronological is, remarkably, the literal translation:

Umgekehrt chronologisch

A Google search confirms that this is used in German.


Antichronologisch and Unchronologisch don't really exist in German.

It's more common to say

Nicht chronologisch

eng. non-chronological


eng. anachronistic



I see some people have problems with their own language. Unchronologisch would be proper to us; the prefix un- is used to show the opposite of something, like unlogisch, unglaublich etc.

  • 3
    There's a difference between "unchronolgisch" (not chronological, i.e., in random order) and "antichronologisch" (in reverse order). – Johannes Kloos Mar 1 '13 at 20:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.