I write sometimes to people which answer not using the neue Rechtschreibung. Some of them write daß instead of dass and use some other spellings for words which already were changed. I have no problem answering in German using the neue Rechtschreibung except that I feel discorteus by answering du, dich, euch, usw. when they write capitalizing those pronouns: Du, Dich, Euch, usw.

Is there a risk to sound impolite if I don't capitalize them?

  • 5
    Note that this change has been diluted in the reform of the reform from 2006 and Du, Ihr etc. may again be capitalised in letters (§ 66 E). I think it is safe to say that letter was not intended to be taken literally, but also to include e-mails for example. I personally capitalise these words whenever I am adressing somebody and only use them uncapitalised for reported speech and similar. (I wonder whether the creators of the rules considered the huge rise of written communication and (written) usage of these pronouns that was already coming, when these rules were made (2006).
    – Wrzlprmft
    Sep 9, 2013 at 20:59
  • 1
    Ich benutze einiges der neuen Schreibung (ss statt ß zum Beispiel) aber beharre auf Du, Dich, Sie wenn ich jmd. anschreibe. Wenn mir aber wer klein schreibt, dann schließe ich einfach 'neue Schreibung' und vermute dass das jeder andere, wohlwollende Mensch ebenfalls tut. Es gibt keinen Grund sich für die Verwendung der neuen Schreibung zu entschuldigen. Sep 9, 2013 at 22:43
  • 1
    @user unknown: Die Großschreibung von Sie wurde von den Reformen nie berührt. Würde mich mal interessieren, wo das Gerücht herkommt.
    – chirlu
    Sep 9, 2013 at 23:48
  • 1
    @chirlu: Aber von Du schon? Wo das Gerücht herkommt weiß ich nicht - womöglich aus Hirnen wie meinem, welches nicht versteht, wieso man das eine abschafft aber das andere nicht. War die große Geste nicht "Vereinfachung"? Sep 10, 2013 at 4:09
  • 2
    @userunknown Mach Dir deswegen keine Sorgen, die große Mehrheit hat es falsch verstanden. Der Unterschied war, dass du, dein, dir, dich die vertrauliche Form ist, und irgendein krankes Hirn war wohl der Ansicht, dass Höflichkeit unter Freunden unwichtig sein, während das höfliche Sie, Ihnen etc. so gelassen wurde. Dec 11, 2019 at 21:47

1 Answer 1


Obviously, there are almost certainly some people left, who would consider it impolite to be addressed by uncapitalised pronouns. However, I would judge the risk of this happening to you very low for the following reasons:

  • This rule did not change without any reason: The default formal address is Sie (which is strictly capitalised anyway for other reasons), and if you are addressing somebody with du, you already are on more friendly terms with him, most probably dropping some other etiquette on the way.
  • Though I capitalise these pronouns, I know only a handful of persons to do so as well and I consider myself to have performed a lot of written formal communication using du (it may very well be that some of these people only capitalised du because I did first). Therefore I expect that almost any other capitaliser of du is used to be addressed with an uncapitalised du and will only have few friends, if he considers this an issue.
  • As already mentioned, you usually address somebody with du in formal communication only, if you already got to know him a little, and had the chance to notice some indicators that he might be offended by an uncapitalised du. For example, if you know that the person is an ardent advocate of the old spelling rules, has conservative views on etiquette and communicates very little in written form with people that are not of his kind; then you might rethink the capitalisation issue. However chances are very high that you will never communicate with such a person, let alone using du.
  • Finally, if German is not your native language, people are even more likely to ignore this issue – if it is an issue to them at all.

As already noted, since the reform of the reform of 2006, Du etc. may again be capitalised in letters (§ 66 E). I think it is safe to say that letter was not intended to be taken literally, but also to include e-mails for example.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.