Skip to main content

Timeline for Comma in infinitive construction

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 8, 2012 at 14:23 comment added cgnieder I acknowledge of course that there is a can-rule for the cases mentioned in the section or if otherwise the sentence would be ambiguous (1). In all other cases I don't think one has a choice. (1) Which prooves me wrong, though, regarding “Wir empfehlen, ihm zu folgen.” ...
Dec 8, 2012 at 14:03 comment added John Smithers No, it's not convincing, @Clemens, especially because this section says, that there is a can-rule. But it's not the first time I disagree with belleslettres.
Dec 8, 2012 at 1:39 comment added cgnieder I know that section. It is discussed on the page I linked in detail (and quite convincing I might add)!
Dec 8, 2012 at 1:07 comment added John Smithers Well, @Clemens, I disagree. See section E:2,c) in pub.ids-mannheim.de/laufend/sprachreport/pdf/sr11-extra.pdf
Dec 7, 2012 at 21:12 comment added cgnieder There is no “can-rule” in the Neue Rechtschreibung. “Wir empfehlen, ihm zu folgen.” is wrong. Please see this excellent tutorial (which also explains why the Duden is wrong about there being 32 rules: there is only one).
Jan 26, 2012 at 20:38 vote accept AGuyCalledGerald
Dec 4, 2011 at 13:58 comment added John Smithers @AndreKR: Follow my link. For "simple" sentences like "Wir zweifeln nicht daran zu gewinnen" it does not make a difference if there is a comma or not. I would put a comma there, because I'm used to do it. But many people think it's superfluous there.
Dec 4, 2011 at 4:28 comment added AndreKR In 1) you point out the advantages of allowing the comma to be there. But what is the advantage of allowing it to be omitted?
Nov 28, 2011 at 19:00 comment added AGuyCalledGerald Good point. This makes sense.
Nov 28, 2011 at 18:35 history answered John Smithers CC BY-SA 3.0