Timeline for What are the preeminent German newspapers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2017 at 9:31 | comment | added | rackandboneman | Ich weiss - war auch keine Kritik an Dir sondern eher um ein bisschen Kontext zu erklären wenn es um genau diese sprachlichen Feinheiten geht... | |
| Sep 17, 2017 at 9:13 | comment | added | Narusan | @rackandboneman Der Name der pol. Ausrichtung sei jetzt einmal dahingestellt. Die konservative Ausrichtung der Zeit ist für mich eindeutig: Eben durch die Berichterstattung über den Ukrainekonflikt. (Die Anstalt / Spiegel haben da Verbindungen zwischen NATO und damaligem Chefredakteur aufgedeckt). Die Zeit nennt sich natürlich nicht rechts, aber auf Englisch ist diese konservative Einstellung nun mal "centre right". | |
| Sep 17, 2017 at 8:59 | comment | added | rackandboneman | @Narusan no one (except unapologetic right wing extremists) would call their conservative politics "rechts" (right wing) in Germany, it had the perjorative meaning that "right wing" is now taking on in the rest of the world here for a long time... | |
| Sep 17, 2017 at 8:27 | comment | added | Takkat | @mach I am only saying that this most upvoted answer is (and will be) incomplete. I beleive it is not a good idea to have Bild but not the SZ or NZZ listed. Where is the Kronenzeitung? ;) | |
| Sep 17, 2017 at 8:06 | comment | added | mach | @Takkat: I beg to differ. There is wide agreement that there is such a thing as Leitmedien or papers of record. It is a fuzzy category, but that should not bar us from using it. Nicht das Kind mit dem Bade ausschütten. | |
| Sep 16, 2017 at 22:18 | comment | added | rackandboneman | On the topic of Tabloids, "Express" probably is worth adding ... "Rheinische Post" and "Hamburger Abendblatt" are more big locals, and "Handelsblatt" probably has an important corner to itself ... | |
| Sep 16, 2017 at 15:38 | comment | added | Narusan | Really? I have the inclination that Die Zeit is centre-right. They were criticised for the covering of the Ukraine crisis and Russland bashing. But that might be up to debate | |
| Sep 16, 2017 at 13:00 | comment | added | Takkat | @mach: only if you tell us what you think "reputable" is - no, we can't decide this. "Reputable" or "preeminent" are such wide terms that we can't really tell which newspapers should be mentioned or not. | |
| Sep 16, 2017 at 13:00 | comment | added | Daniel Jour | Since the question is tagged as "online-resources" also I'd like to add that many of the online articles of most of the mentioned papers are IMO neither especially suitable for learning the language nor can be praised for their content. | |
| Sep 16, 2017 at 12:37 | comment | added | mach | @Takkat: Please tell us what other most reputable titles you are thinking of. | |
| Sep 16, 2017 at 12:07 | comment | added | Philip Klöcking | Seconded for Süddeutsche, which I would put on a similar reputational level as FAZ, with slightly more original journalism (often gets cited by other news as the original source) and slightly fewer commentaries. | |
| Sep 16, 2017 at 8:27 | comment | added | Philipp | I cannot agree that Der Spiegel or Die Zeit are leaning towards the "left" spectrum. Particularly Die Zeit. Maybe that was the case years ago, but I don't perceive them as such anymore. I'm not judging their influence, though. | |
| Sep 16, 2017 at 7:59 | comment | added | Takkat | @mach: there are more than two missing ;) | |
| Sep 16, 2017 at 6:50 | comment | added | mach | This list is missing two most reputable titles that can only compare to the FAZ, the Neue Zürcher Zeitung and the Süddeutsche Zeitung. | |
| Sep 16, 2017 at 1:22 | history | answered | Jimi Jackson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |