Timeline for Plural of Assembly
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2012 at 22:05 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 14, 2012 at 8:23 | |||||
| Sep 11, 2012 at 4:23 | comment | added | user unknown | Ich denke persönliche Regeln haben hier nichts verloren - es geht darum, was richtig ist. Zwar reagiert man bei Heise auf Anregungen zur Schreibung, aber dies ist auch häufig nötig. | |
| Sep 6, 2012 at 10:11 | history | edited | Yves | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Sep 6, 2012 at 10:11 | comment | added | Yves | I'm talking about the standard rule for foreign words (Pluralform von Fremdwörter) in the reformed spelling and grammar rules, not the standard rule for the German language, and we agree on this. You did'nt read the end of the first phrase. | |
| Sep 5, 2012 at 21:41 | comment | added | Philipp | -1. There is no standard rule to add "s" to form a plural–in fact, German words rarely use "s" as plural marker. It's very common for words derived from English, though. I also strongly disagree with your other suggestion. When used in a text, "Assembly" is just a normal German word, and should therefore be capitalized like any German noun, and never put in quotes (it's not a quotation!) or italicized. Regarding the plural form, I'd consider both variants ("Assemblys" and "Assemblies") correct, with a slight preference towards the former, which is analogous to "Babys" and "Partys". | |
| Sep 5, 2012 at 9:12 | history | edited | Yves | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
| Sep 5, 2012 at 9:09 | comment | added | Yves | which edit ? concerning heise ? | |
| Sep 5, 2012 at 8:24 | comment | added | Em1 | +1 for your answer, but -1 for your edit. | |
| Sep 5, 2012 at 8:12 | history | edited | Yves | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 306 characters in body
|
| Sep 5, 2012 at 8:07 | history | answered | Yves | CC BY-SA 3.0 |