6

I wonder if there is a rule how to say it right. Let’s say you want trade wood for straw. So you have wood and the other one should have straw. So you ask:

Tauscht jemand Holz gegen Stroh?

But if you swap Holz and Stroh it means the same.

Tauscht jemand Stroh gegen Holz?

So which one should be first: What I have or what I want?

1
  • 8
    Reminds me of the 25-year-old joke of an ex-GDR guy who came to a gas station and said: "Ich hätte gerne eine Zündkerze für meinen Trabbi" and the guy in the shop answered: "OK, mach' ich - Guter Tausch"
    – tofro
    Sep 13, 2016 at 19:10

2 Answers 2

4

As simple as that:

Ich tausche das, was ich habe, gegen das, was ich will.

You can only tauschen, what you already have. What you get for it, is introduced with the preposition gegen.

2
  • An additional problem here is the jemand. You are referring to the other person, who would want to swap what they have against what you want. Sep 14, 2016 at 8:13
  • I think switching subjects should not be a problem.
    – Liglo App
    Sep 14, 2016 at 8:25
4

My family plays the game die Siedler von Catan a lot, wherein a large part of gameplay centres around people swapping goods. I’ve noted that we hardly ever use the word tauschen for the direct exchange to prevent just that ambiguity. If I have wood and I need grain (it’s not really straw in the game), we usually say:

Will jemand Getreide abgeben?

Will jemand Holz haben?

With these verbs it is always clear which direction you are talking about. We only use tauschen in a very generic way:

Will jemand mit mir tauschen?

Note that contrary to Barth’s answer, I initially understood the sentences in the wrong way, so it is definitely better to prevent any misunderstanding on the word choice level.

3
  • 2
    I also discovered the problem in that game.
    – Colin
    Sep 13, 2016 at 21:25
  • 2
    I very much agree with the last paragraph, having understood offer and request like Jan. We usually go with unambiguous verbs like biete and suche or brauche.
    – Stephie
    Sep 14, 2016 at 5:10
  • I would also say that it is completely ambiguous. Sep 14, 2016 at 8:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.