I saw this sentence today: "Du kannst in der Werkstatt am Ende der Straße ein Auto mieten."
But according to the TeKaMoLo rule, shouldn't "Ende der Straße" be at the end since it indicates location? Thanks.
I saw this sentence today: "Du kannst in der Werkstatt am Ende der Straße ein Auto mieten."
But according to the TeKaMoLo rule, shouldn't "Ende der Straße" be at the end since it indicates location? Thanks.
As I understand TeKaMoLo (never encountered this term in school) it applies only to supplements of the same level. This is not the case here, since am Ende der Straße adds details to Werkstatt as would the more elaborate sentence:
Du kannst in der Werkstatt, die sich am Ende der Straße befindet, ein Auto mieten.
If you put Ende der Straße to the end of the sentence, it would be quite complicated, to refer back to Werkstatt.
TeKaMoLo cannot provide any guidance here because the whole phrase in der Werkstatt am Ende der Straße is a local adverbial phrase, and there is no temporal, causal, or modal adverbial.
Also note that mieten is at the end because it forms a sentence bracket with the finite auxiliary verb kannst. Adverbial phrases can be factored out but ususally they are not.
So we have the word order:
Subject - finite verb part - local adverbial - object - infinite verb part
One could also use:
Subject - finite verb part - object - local adverbial - infinite verb part
which gives us:
Du kannst ein Auto in der Werkstatt am Ende der Straße mieten.
Both word orders are valid, and the difference is very subtle to non-existent. To me, the original order feels a bit more natural because the words "ein Auto mieten" which form some functional unit are kept together.